Minister Manickchand talks a good talk

Dear Editor,
I have read Minister Manickchand’s strident response to my comments as reported in the press, and despite the fact that she has totally misunderstood them, I will refrain from engaging in a public debate on the safety of young children left vulnerable and unprotected.
I do need to say that Minister Manickchand talks a good talk and we hope that she will walk a good walk by seeing all the legislation through to the stage of enforcement.
She needs to rest assured that my admiration, respect and support for her, and her work in protecting the vulnerable men, women and children in our society from sexual predators, remains intact, even in the face of our obvious and very public differences of opinion.

Raphael Trotman

 

 

 

Source: https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2009/10/21/minister-manickchand-talks-a-good-talk/

 

Linden gets Legal Aid clinic

Minister of Human Services and Social Security, Priya Manickchand, will launch today, the Linden Branch of the Guyana Legal Aid Clinic.
Coastal dwellers, Berbicians and Essequibians, are already enjoying the Legal Aid services.
Over the years, the Guyana Legal Aid Centre (GLAC) has been playing an integral role in assisting persons of limited means with legal advice and representation.
The centre currently has four offices namely in Georgetown, Essequibo, West Coast Berbice and East Berbice/Corentyne.

Attorney-at-Law Khemraj Ramjattan recently said that legal aid is a very positive development and he commended Manickchand, for the service outside Georgetown.
According to Ramjattan, lawyers’ fees and costs for bringing litigation are largely beyond many persons in Guyana, and the Government has helped by stepping in and providing some form of legal aid.
Ramjattan added that the government should ensure that more money is put into legal aid, and not the very sparse sum that is today being put. Statistics show that from January to September last year, GLAC had a clientele of 1,460.

The website states that for civil matters, which include adoption, bigamy, division of property, divorce and domestic violence, the legal aid centre had interviewed 1,361 persons, advised and represented 645, given advice to 711 persons, and found 5 persons ineligible for legal aid.
In terms of criminal matters, such as assault, disorderly behaviour, murder/manslaughter, rape/carnal knowledge and robbery and theft, the clinic interviewed 99 persons and advised and represented 34.
GLAC’s Essequibo office clientele for June to September last was 235, while for Region Five (Fort Wellington) for July to September it was 40. Last year, GLAC had a clientele of 1,945.
Guyana Legal Aid Centre (formerly Georgetown Legal Aid Clinic) is a non-governmental, non-profit, non-partisan organisation formed to provide legal aid to persons who cannot afford to employ the services of a member of the private bar.

It existed in the 1970s, and was resuscitated in March 1994.
To date, it has assisted over 10,000 people, the majority of them women.
It also provides legal advice and assistance in relation to civil matters, including a review of the funding of such cases in light of international best practice (e.g. provision of legal aid; no-win no-fee arrangements); and improves “customer service” ethos of justice sector institutions, the revised strategy stated.

Source: https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2009/06/19/linden-gets-legal-aid-clinic/

 

Manickchand calls for speedier implementation of Family Court

Minister of Human Services and Social Security, Priya Manickchand, during a recent debate in the National Assembly on the Children’s Bill said that there are several pieces of legislation being debated and passed that will require the services of a family court dedicated to disposing of such matters efficaciously.
Manickchand told the House, “The governing party with its usual vision, anticipated and expressed a commitment in its 2006 manifesto to establish a family court.” The government has evidenced its commitment to establish the family court by approving last year, at the level of the Cabinet, the establishment of such a court.
The actual establishment, Manickchand told the National Assembly, is now dependent on the administration of justice. She expressed the hope that those arrangements be made with dispatch.
According to Manickchand, family matters are already being dealt with in the High Court but there should be the assigning of a specific Court to deal with family related matters. Manickchand told the National Assembly that she is not of the view that the country needs to wait on the actual construction of a separate building before the court can begin sitting and hearing matters.
This, she said, would be a step in the right direction, given that money has already been allocated for the construction of such a court. This was mentioned by the Finance Minister Dr Ashni Singh during his 2009 Budget presentation.
Matters to be dealt with in the proposed family court, according to Manickchand, include but is not limited to the dissolution of marriages, breach of contract of marriage, alimony and maintenance orders for deserted spouses, proceedings under the Married Persons Property Act and under the Family and Dependants Provision Act as well as any proceedings under the recently approved Adoption of Children Bill as well as Protection of Children Bill among others.
The allocation of funds for such a court is contemplated against the background of the wider Justice Sector Reform Strategy which is aimed at improving the justice sector and the services it provides.
According to Manickchand, family matters in the High Court take just as long as some other cases, and even longer than many.
She added that it is an even more horrendous situation in that the lengthy time a matter takes to be disposed of presents much hardship and danger to the litigants who in most cases are women and children.
The establishment of a Family Court will result in more speedy, sensitive and effective resolution of matters involving the family.
According to Manickchand, the establishment of such a court should see the persons on the bench being a Judge vested with the same authority of that of a High Court Judge.
Manickchand said that the maximum number of judges may be prescribed from time to time by order of the President, but she was confident that his decision would be conducive to the reality in the judicial system as it relates to the amount of cases before the court as well as the average amount of family related cases filed each year, balanced with our resources as a country.
The Minister added, too, that a unique opportunity has also presented itself with the legislation approved for the use of audio/visual and research has shown that sex offences courts with the special feature result in more equitable justice with more convictions being obtained.
She added that the Sexual Offences Bill is in its final draft and will be tabled in the National Assembly shortly and that piece of legislation provides for the usage of the audio/visual features.

 

Source: https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2009/05/26/manickchand-calls-for-speedier-implementation-of-family-court/

 

‘MEN’ joins fight against domestic violence

Calling on men to stand up in opposition against all forms of violence, especially the rampant plague of violence against women, the Men Empowering Network (MEN) yesterday launched an ambitious agenda to tackle the problem through direct engagements across the country.

On the platform of “a different approach,” MEN has proposed to uproot the scourge of the problem by insisting that domestic violence never be treated in isolation as simply a woman’s issue, but rather a threat to the civil liberties of the entire populace. By addressing what it says is a culture of abuse in the country and focusing on how young men are socialized in the society, MEN proposes a strategy of examining the causative and contributive factors to the problem.

Priya Manickchand
Priya Manickchand

The issues of power and control and how they translate in the man/woman relationship were prominent in the discussions at the International Convention Centre yesterday, where MEN outlined what it intends to do within the next few months under the theme, ‘Confronting Domestic Violence’.

It is working in collaboration with the Ministry of Human Services and Social Security.

MEN’s Chairman Reverend Kwame Gilbert explained that there is a crucial need to arrest and change the culture of abuse and not simply to stop the violence that is, “sometimes overlooked as a private matter between a man and his woman.” He spoke of the difficulties in relationships, saying that violence is often minimized and justified because there is no clear definition of what constitutes abuse and the difference between what is harmful and harmless. In the context of such a relationship, he said, violence is also reframed to protect the positive aspects of the union.

But he stressed that there can be no compromise. “I wish to insist that the compromise of one’s safety and dignity for the security and/or pleasure of a body in bed is a foolish and dangerous trade-off,” Gilbert declared.

He underscored the issue of domestic violence being tied to the general nature of how people interact with each other in the society, noting that people have lost the ability to resolve their differences in a non-violent, humane and civilized manner and that acrimony and contention seem to be the first response to almost every issue.

MEN intends to offer alternative forms of conflict resolution and promote a culture of non-violence as it engages young boys and men at the community level and within faith-based organisations.

Minister Priya Manickchand endorsed the comments made by Gilbert, pointing to crucial need for an organization like MEN. She noted that prior to the launch of the group there had been no major and sustained movement by men to tackle the issue.

She lamented the recent murders of women in the country and the increased reports of abuse being perpetrated against women and children, noting that legislation would be introduced shortly to support existing initiatives.

Manickchand made the link between men’s involvement and the success of programmes implemented to address the issue of domestic violence saying that she had hoped for an earlier intervention.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Sam hinds reiterated what Manickchand said on the issue of men getting involved. He also called for a compassionate approach by men in an effort to change attitudes in the society.

British High Commissioner to Guyana Fraser Wheeler also commented to the media after the session that domestic violence is “a real constraint” on the development of the country, but noted that the administration has been making commendable strides, with Manickchand at the helm.

He said too that the partnership between men and government is important while noting that it is also very important that the new legislation is implemented fully.

Source: https://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/news/stories/05/26/men-joins-fight-against-domestic-violence/

 
 

Manickchand calls for speedier implementation of Family Court

Minister of Human Services and Social Security, Priya Manickchand, during a recent debate in the National Assembly on the Children’s Bill said that there are several pieces of legislation being debated and passed that will require the services of a family court dedicated to disposing of such matters efficaciously.

Manickchand told the House, “The governing party with its usual vision, anticipated and expressed a commitment in its 2006 manifesto to establish a family court.” The government has evidenced its commitment to establish the family court by approving last year, at the level of the Cabinet, the establishment of such a court.

The actual establishment, Manickchand told the National Assembly, is now dependent on the administration of justice. She expressed the hope that those arrangements be made with dispatch.

According to Manickchand, family matters are already being dealt with in the High Court but there should be the assigning of a specific Court to deal with family related matters. Manickchand told the National Assembly that she is not of the view that the country needs to wait on the actual construction of a separate building before the court can begin sitting and hearing matters.

This, she said, would be a step in the right direction, given that money has already been allocated for the construction of such a court. This was mentioned by the Finance Minister Dr Ashni Singh during his 2009 Budget presentation.

Matters to be dealt with in the proposed family court, according to Manickchand, include but is not limited to the dissolution of marriages, breach of contract of marriage, alimony and maintenance orders for deserted spouses, proceedings under the Married Persons Property Act and under the Family and Dependants Provision Act as well as any proceedings under the recently approved Adoption of Children Bill as well as Protection of Children Bill among others.

The allocation of funds for such a court is contemplated against the background of the wider Justice Sector Reform Strategy which is aimed at improving the justice sector and the services it provides.
According to Manickchand, family matters in the High Court take just as long as some other cases, and even longer than many.

She added that it is an even more horrendous situation in that the lengthy time a matter takes to be disposed of presents much hardship and danger to the litigants who in most cases are women and children.
The establishment of a Family Court will result in more speedy, sensitive and effective resolution of matters involving the family.

According to Manickchand, the establishment of such a court should see the persons on the bench being a Judge vested with the same authority of that of a High Court Judge.

Manickchand said that the maximum number of judges may be prescribed from time to time by order of the President, but she was confident that his decision would be conducive to the reality in the judicial system as it relates to the amount of cases before the court as well as the average amount of family related cases filed each year, balanced with our resources as a country.

The Minister added, too, that a unique opportunity has also presented itself with the legislation approved for the use of audio/visual and research has shown that sex offences courts with the special feature result in more equitable justice with more convictions being obtained.

She added that the Sexual Offences Bill is in its final draft and will be tabled in the National Assembly shortly and that piece of legislation provides for the usage of the audio/visual features.

 

Source: https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2009/05/26/manickchand-calls-for-speedier-implementation-of-family-court/

‘Modern’ child adoption bill passed

-reaping of financial rewards to be criminalized

Two bills, which seek to modernize the laws governing the legal status of children and adoptions, were yesterday unanimously passed by the National Assembly, in a move deemed as progressive in the effort to protect the basic human rights of Guyanese children.

 

The two pieces of legislation were passed with amendments after each of the two bills was sent to a Special Select Committee for consideration and report.
The Status of Children Bill 2009 will pave the way for all children, whether they are of biological parents, adoptive parents or born in or out of wedlock, to have equal legal status. It will also give the courts the right to declare on application to determine parentage and cater for parentage testing procedures like DNA testing, among a host of other reforms.

The Status of Children Bill 2009 will repeal and re-enact the provisions of the 1983 Children Born Out of Wedlock (Removal of Discrimination) Act 1983, and sets out the manner in which wills or other instruments made on and after May, 1983 are to be interpreted.

Meanwhile, the Adoption of Children Bill 2009 stipulates that authorities charged with making adoption orders consider the best interests of the child, both in childhood and in later life as being  “of paramount consideration.” It provides that the adoption is to be regarded as a service for the child and not for adults wishing to acquire the care of the child. Indeed, the Bill states that no adult has a right to adopt the child and if the child is able to form his/her own views on a matter concerning adoption, he/she shall be given an opportunity to express those views freely and those views are to be given due weight in the circumstances. The law provides that the child’s given name or names, identity, language and cultural and religious ties should, as far as possible, be identified and preserved.

 

The bill proposes that determining the best interests of the child, the decision maker is to have regard to any wishes expressed by the child, the child’s age, gender, maturity, level of understanding, and background and family relationships and any other characteristics of the child that the decision maker thinks are relevant. Additionally, other factors to be weighed would include the child’s physical, emotional and educational needs, including the child’s sense of personal, family and cultural identity, as well as any disability that the child has, any wishes expressed by either or both of the parents of the child. The suitability and capacity of each adopter, or any other person, to provide for the needs of the child and alternatives to the making of an adoption order, are also to be weighed

Human Services and Social Security Minister Priya Manickchand described the bills as modern ones which benefited from widespread consultations and from the expertise of both local and overseas experts.
Speaking specifically about The Status of Children Bill, she said that this bill benefited from the expert advice of individuals from the Guyana Association of Women Lawyers as well as an expert from UNICEF, who was involved in the drafting of the bill. The Minister said that the bill sought to create an environment where discrimination against children cannot exist and added that the piece of legislation reflected the world’s changes since 1983. She stated that the bill, “unlike similar legislation in the region and internationally, takes into consideration advances in technology for assisted reproduction and eliminates areas of discrimination which persists in similar legislation elsewhere.”

In relation to the Adoption of Children Bill 2009, Manickchand pointed out that this piece of legislation was part of the PPP/C’s Manifesto of 2006 and reflects enlightened changes in the world and recognizes children’s rights. She said that the bill reflected the Ministry’s policy in dealing with children.

Manickchand also said that the bill brings the nation into conformity  with several international treaties including the Convention on  the Rights of  the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women as well as the RIAD guidelines which have been set up to protect minors.

 

According to Manickchand, whenever a child is found in difficult circumstances, he or she is removed from those circumstances. The child is then held in an environment that is child friendly, she added. She explained that every attempt is made to reintegrate the child with their family and she said that Ministry will offer parents what they need to ensure that child has what he or she needs.  She said that where children cannot be reintegrated with their parents, efforts will be made to foster them.  The Minister disclosed that a foster care programme is in the pipelines.  She said when this is not possible, they will be kept in institutional care.  She said that when these children can be adopted t hey will be adopted.  About 600 children are in orphanages locally, the Minister said.

She said the new bill will clarify issues relating to adoption and suggested that it would make the adoption process easier. The Minister, meanwhile, pointed out that in most local adoption cases, the children are adopted by relatives. She stated that there are few cases where “strangers” adopt children.

PNCR-1G MP Clarissa Riehl indicated her party’s support of the bill. She said that the bills were welcomed and acknowledged their usefulness in protecting the rights of children. In relation the Status of Children Bill, she identified this as being “comprehensive” and said that this was “21st century legislation”. She said that society had made progress in removing stigma attached to  children born out of wedlock and  said that this bill was a  continued step along the right direction.

Alliance For Change MP Latchmin Punalall, in her short presentations indicated her party’s support for both bills. Quoting from the Holy Bible, the MP emphasized that children were important to God and that parents had a responsibility to their children. Speaking about the Adoption Bill, she said that ideally a child should be brought up by their God-fearing biological parents, but pointed out that the society was far from perfect and as such adoption was necessary. While acknowledging the virtues of the bills, she emphasized that they needed to be executed in the best interests of the children.

 

Attorney-at-law Anil Nandlall spoke for the Government and said that the bill was a welcome piece of legislation even as he stated that the government has always placed emphasis on youth and their development. He said that the bill was necessary so as to address the changes in society.

He pointed out that the government did not hastily adopt the bills but had extensive consultations with various stakeholders in excess of a decade.
The attorney said that the implementation of the Adoption Board, which the bill proposes, is necessary and welcome.  He said that the new legislation also clearly identifies issues that were missing in the previous legislation. He identified the criminalizing of the reaping of financial rewards in the adoption process as an important issue addressed in this bill. He also said that the person who wishes to adopt a child must be 65 or younger. He explained that this was to ensure that the parent would be physically able to look after the child. He stated that under the new bill, when the child reaches a certain age must agree to the adoption. He also said that the bill addressed the issue of overseas persons adopting Guyanese.
PPP/C MP Mohamed Khan spoke on the Status of Children Bill while Government member Shirley Edwards spoke briefly on the Adoption Bill.

 

 

 

 

 

Source: https://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/news/guyana/05/22/modern%E2%80%99-child-adoption-bill-passed/

Cabinet clears Family Court

The government will be proceeding with a special Family Court, Human Services Minister Priya Manickchand said on Wednesday.

According to Manickchand, the decision was made at Tuesday’s meeting of Cabinet.
The court will come under the jurisdiction of the High Court and will deal with all family-related disputes.  The Minister said that when considering several of the new laws that the government intends to institute, it was decided that the legal system will be better  served if it had its own court that dealt specifically with family matters.  It is the Minister’s opinion that the establishment of the court will also speed up the legal proceedings in family matters which often drag on for years.

Manickchand, however, was unable to say how soon this court would be set up. She explained that some time may be needed to get infrastructural aspects settled as well as to adequately train the staff. The Minister said that although ideally the court should be housed in a separate building, the main aim at present is to get the Court functioning as quickly as possible.

The minister made the announcement at the launching of a new dormitory for the Joshua House.

Source:https://www.stabroeknews.com/2008/news/stories/10/24/cabinet-clears-family-court/

 
 

Legal Aid centre launched in Berbice

“Thanks to the democratic revolution of 1992, we have a legal aid system,” former director of the Georgetown Legal Aid Clinic Miles Fitzpatrick said at the recent launch of the ‘Guyana Legal Aid Clinic’ in Berbice.

According to a Government Information Agency (GINA) press release Fitzpatrick, Minister of Human Services and Social Security Priya Manickchand and Region Six Chairman Zulfikar Mustapha addressed an audience at the Regional Democratic Council Compound in New Amsterdam for the opening.

 

Fitzpatrick said that years ago, legal aid clinics “did not have the support of the government of the day.” He continued that the PNC government “was extremely sensitive about this institution that was started by independent lawyers” and had claimed at the time that no third world country could finance the legal aid system. However, he said, “You do the best with what you have. If your resources are small, you start small and you help as many people as you can in the best way that you can….”

Meanwhile Manickchand said in 2006 the current administration had committed to expanding legal services throughout the country. “I’m happy to say that we have legal aid service in Regions Two, Three, Four, Five, Six and Ten,” she said, adding that the only role the administration plays in the legal system is to provide funding and ensure that the services are provided to everyone. The minister said too, “Legal aid is supposed to give you a doorway into the court system and that is why we are very keen on ensuring that legal aid is accessible,” throughout the country.

In addition, Mustapha said over the years the lives of poor and vulnerable persons have improved significantly with the services provided by the ministry. Residents also expressed gratitude for the service, recalling that legal aid services were first offered from 1974 to 1983 but thereafter had ceased. The Georgetown clinic opened in 1994.

 

Source: https://www.stabroeknews.com/2008/news/stories/10/21/legal-aid-centre-launched-in-berbice/

Legal aid comes to Region Five

With the establishment of the Guyana Legal Aid Clinic (GLAC) at Fort Wellington, West Berbice vulnerable persons in Region Five will now have access to free legal services and be able to enjoy their rights in the courts.

Minister of Human Services & Social Security, Priya Manickchand addressing the gathering. Seated in the front row at left is attorney-at-law, Yogini Lochan (behind plant). At a small ceremony held in the compound of the Regional Democratic Council (RDC), Minister of Human Services and Social Services, Priya Manickchand  told the gathering that the clinic is one of the manifestations of the government taking services closer to the people. She said that those who stand to benefit among the vulnerable persons are the poor, the old and children.

 

Ironically while the ceremony was in progress a small group of mostly women and children who said they represented the poor stood outside the compound picketing the minister.

They were displaying placards some of which read, “Priya you betray the single parents,” “No money, no Carifesta,” “Priya fulfill your promises or go,” “Priya mothers are starving” and “Stop pretending Priya – Life is hard.”

According to the minister, “We don’t want to see our children out of school; we don’t want to see our children holding placards in their hands… we want to see our children cared for and protected.”

Some of the children displaying placards during the launching of the legal aid clinic at Fort WellingtonShe mentioned too that two thirds of the people who are benefiting from public assistance are children and said that it would be increased by 63% this year and that pensions have been raised by 82%.

The clinic which is located in a section of the bottom flat of the RDC office would be run by a young lawyer, Yogini Lochan. She would be present at the office three days per week and will also serve at all the courts in the region, the minister said.

 

Referring to the clinic which was launched in Region 2 earlier this month, Manickchand said that 44 persons have already benefited from the service. She said out of those persons eight got advice and two were disqualified because they were thought to have sufficient means.

She added that 11 matters would be instituted in the magistrate’s court, 21 in the high court and four would be dealt with at both courts.
She pointed out that these persons would never have been able to have “legal services, access the court or enjoy their rights” if the government had not provided the funding for the expansion of legal aid services across Guyana.

She said that by the end of August legal aid clinics would be launched in Region 6 and Region 10.
Teni Housty, President of the Guyana Bar Association (GBA) reiterated that the legal aid clinic is one of the critical tools to promote access to justice. He noted that one of the fundamental flaws in the justice system in serving a community is the lack of access to justice.

He urged persons to think of the clinic as a source of information and as an alternative for resolving their disputes. He said that the clinic would assist in several areas including domestic violence and human rights. It would also help persons to gain individual strength and autonomy, he said.

Further, Housty said that the GBA would work with the clinic as a strategic partner, acknowledging that everything cannot be done by one dedicated lawyer. He pledged the support of the lawyers of the GBA.

 

In her address, Josephine Whitehead of the GLAC said that the sole purpose of the clinic is to provide free or subsidized service to persons and that all complaints of the exploitation of the service would be investigated.

Renai Mc Almont, assistant overseer of the Union/Naarstigheid Neighbourhood Democratic Council remarked that the clinic is a “dream come true for women who are battered from time to time or unjustly treated and are unable to afford legal fees.” 

The feature address was delivered by Speaker of the National Assembly and former director of the Board of Directors of the Georgetown Legal Aid Clinic, Ralph Ramkarran. Also giving brief remarks were Chairman of Region 5, Harrinarine Baldeo and Gem Sanford-Johnson, President of the Guyana Association of Women Lawyers. (Shabna Ullah)

 

Source: https://www.stabroeknews.com/2008/news/stories/06/28/legal-aid-comes-to-region-five/

Nurturing child criminals: an indictment of Guyanese society?

It is a familiar sight in many depressed urban communities and increasingly in rural areas as well: idle young men sitting at street corners all day. It is these groups, observers believe, that churn out Guyana’s ever-growing criminal class. Facing hopelessness in a social and political system that offers little opportunity, most start out by begging and eventually graduate – some to petty crime, others to drugs, guns and unspeakable violence. And observers’ views vary only slightly on the path that takes them there.       

 

Is it an indictment on the present administration, as some observers argue, that in the 16 years it has been in office, it has “raised” a number of teen killers? Minister of Human Services and Social Security Priya Manickchand, disagreed. Urging that the plight of teenagers who turned to guns not be politicized, she stated that although some of the criminals today had been born under the present regime their lives had been influenced by what occurred several years before. Manickchand admitted that her ministry may not be able to reach the 14-year-old boy aback of Buxton or Agricola to steer him away from a life of crime, but noted that those closest to such a child should equally share the responsibility of offering him hope. “Child protection is not only about programmes, but children need the right environment, and the politicians and the social workers will all have to work hand in hand to accomplish this,” the minister asserted.   

Manickchand noted that juvenile delinquency was no new phenomenon, adding that her ministry, as well as the Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sport, had been working to address the needs of vulnerable youths, although she acknowledged that some of the programmes were not reaching everyone.  

Sociologists and criminologists say that there is a rise in youth violence globally. In Guyana, most of the crimes today are committed by young men — some still in their 20s. Over the past three years also, scores of teenagers have passed through the courts for their alleged involvement in serious crimes and a number of them have perished during gunfights.

Broken families
Marriage and family life expert, Stanton Adams, was of the view that the extent of teenagers’  involvement in violent crime pointed to a breakdown in the institution of the family. He said the situation was so stark that the question should be asked as to where would we find the next generation of leaders. Adams dismissed the view of some social commentators that poverty was the number one contributing factor to the rise in crime.

 

“People can be poor yet have dignity,” Adams, who is also the executive director of the Guyana Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, said. The dignity of which he spoke came from the kind of nurturing one got from one’s family, and if the family was failing to carry out its duties then it would only produce delinquents, he continued. Adams argued that poverty could not be totally eradicated, but that values once taught would remain.
Recently, a teenager in Buxton was charged with murdering 11 people at Lusignan. Two other young men — Jermaine ‘Skinny’ Charles and another referred to as ‘Nasty Man’ — are also before the court on a number of murder charges.

Frequently, parents of teens caught up in crime will say that they tried their best, but their children just chose the wrong path. Asked whether he believed this was indeed the case in some instances, Adams said the possibility existed. However, he noted, many parents saw parenting as just producing offspring, when it was also about producing disciplined, mature and self-governing offspring. “Once you have not done this then you have failed. You have not done your best,” Adams said.

Speaking directly to teenagers’ involvement in violent crimes, Adams said males were being neglected in society. Pointing to the many organisations that dealt with empowering women and girls, he noted that none addressed the needs of men and boys. “Nobody sees boys as a vulnerable group and they are left sometimes on their own… so we have some turning to drugs and becoming serial killers.”  Adams further noted that the growing problems among teenage boys were partly due to the absence of father figures in the home. He told Stabroek News that most of the single-parent households in the Caribbean were headed by women. “We need the fathers back in the homes…even if they are not there physically they must be there for their children in their education and other areas,” Adams said. He maintained that a number of the teen killers today would have grown up without even having the opportunity to sit and talk with their fathers. “This is a very serious issue and we need to address it,” Adams said.

Asked what was wrong with a society that produced child killers, Adams said if people could not find anything to be attached to, to give them hope and comfort, they would turn to drugs and crime. “We have people with no sense of significance roaming about our society; they have no role models, in some cases no parents or absentee parents.” It is this group whom drug lords prey on to carry out their nefarious activities, he said.

 

President Bharrat Jagdeo, speaking recently at an event at Babu John, Port Mourant, Berbice weighed in on this topic, telling the young people who were there that they needed to believe in something. “We need to have an ideal,” Jagdeo said, adding that these days he was hearing a lot of talk, but sometimes felt that youths were not committed to an ideal any longer. “When I travel through this country I see people, young people, waiting for the next hundred dollars coming from the States, not wanting to work. The work ethic is gone, [they are] drinking every single day [and] beating up the women,” Jagdeo declared.    

Blame the parents
Speaking on behalf of young people in Buxton, a number of whom had joined criminal gangs, prominent Buxtonian, Deon Abrams, laid some of the blame on parents whom he said were responsible for the lives their children led today.

In an interview with Stabroek News, Abrams revealed that in the initial stage of the criminal uprising in that community, “some parents were accommodating to their sons gravitating to a life of crime.” Coupled with this, he said, was the breakdown of the family unit.

“However,” he said, “there are cases where parents were against their children involving in criminal activities and spoke out, but the result was that they were threatened.” 

 

A teacher by profession, Abrams said that many of the young men caught up in this situation were from a generation which the education system had failed. “Most of them are products of Buxton Community High School. Community schools, over the years, have been dumping grounds for children who need special attention. The fact is that they were not given the sort of attention needed. They passed through without any skills and are now misfits without options,” Abrams said.

Asked whether the elders in Buxton still looked out for children who had strayed, Abrams responded yes, but that it was not like it used to be. “Some of the parents are themselves lacking parenting,” he explained, noting that the many teenage mothers and fathers could hardly take care of themselves, let alone deal with parenting.

Asked what was propelling the violence among youths in his community, Abrams disagreed that the situation existed only in Buxton. He noted that teen criminals today were motivated by money and believed that crime was a means of acquiring money easily. He said many of the young men in Buxton who had turned to a life of crime grew up in a society where they heard of big robberies and also partook of the proceeds of those crimes, since the criminals in the past took back some of the money to the community. “So they grew up seeing money floating around and this would have influenced them,” Abrams said. 

He added that in pursuit of power, some of the young men would have gravitated to crime. “When they have a gun it gives them a certain sense of power that they believe they can never possess.”

 

He went on to say that young men involved in crime were often so emboldened by the possession of a gun, they disrespected their parents and peers. “Once they hold a gun no one can talk to them,” Abrams said. 

Questioned as to what could be done to reverse the tide, Abrams replied that a number of residents had given up speaking to the teenagers bent on committing crimes. He said this was so because the gunmen themselves would issue threats to those they perceived to be in opposition to what they were doing. He noted that at one time in the village, anyone seen not to be in favour of the gunmen became a target and was branded an informant. “So people became fearful to comment on certain things and were careful who they spoke to,” Abrams disclosed.

Freedom fighters 
Abrams said, however, that there was hardly anything Buxtonians could do now to stop the criminals. He said if the state with the armed forces could not deal with them for over seven years now, Buxtonians could not do it either.

There was a pool of people in the initial stage of the criminal uprising in the village, he explained, who thought the escapees could have “brought control to the PPP/C government,” and freed Afro-Guyanese from economic and social oppression. He said this view was strongly entrenched in the psyche of some of the residents, and led to big marches in the community whenever one of the five prison escapees died. After a while, however, the very gunmen who had been hailed as freedom fighters became rebellious. “People became aware that the thing was not working after black people were being killed, and so some villagers shunned the gunmen,” Abrams says.

 

He expressed the view there may be pockets of people who were willing to uphold such a revolution, but their numbers were getting thin.

Asked what was necessary to transform the village, Abrams responded that there needed to be a transformation of Guyana. He reiterated that crime was not just a Buxton problem, although acknowledged that the criminals had made Buxton one of their bases. He said Buxton had been chosen as a criminal base because throughout history the village had always been a militant one and had played an integral part in the struggle during the 1950s and ’60s. “The militant nature of the village would have led many people to see Buxton as their salvation. Even in the protests, people looked to Buxtonians for the stamina, so it is not a surprise that the village was chosen for any kind of revolutionary action,” Abrams asserted.

‘Guns have killed the struggle’
But Buxton had run out of steam lately and residents were not as militant as they were in the past, and this, Abrams said, was because of the emergence of guns. “Guns have killed the struggle,” he said, noting that with guns the prospect of death was very real.

According to Abrams, those who had been involved in the earlier struggles in the village would certainly have seen the difference between what the struggle was then and what it is now. Back then people had been prepared to get on the streets and throw back tear gas at the police. But the emergence of guns had driven a deep fear into them. 

 

Minister Manickchand said her government’s policies to protect children from, not only crime, but other social ills, were sound. However, she said, often citizens were not very receptive and some had not been responding. Manickchand said her ministry had rescued hundreds of youths from the streets, who could have become violent criminals. The minister believed the onus was on all Guyanese to ensure there was a reverse in youth violence, and urged parents to take the lead.

Asked about her ministry’s family and welfare programme, the minister conceded that it was not up to scratch as not enough focus had been placed on this area.

But Abrams felt there was a deliberate effort by the PPP government to shift resources away from black communities and direct them to Indian villages, creating a situation where black youths were deprived of opportunities. Abrams said this had been happening at the level of central government and also at the regional level, and even some projects that were funded by donor agencies were handed out to supporters of the government.

The Buxtonian believed that the policies of the administration were also a contributing factor to the problems faced by many youths, not least in Buxton. “If changes are not made at the national level, Buxton would be repeated over and over again,” Abrams warned.

 

 

 

 

Source: By Nigel Williams; https://www.stabroeknews.com/2008/news/guyana/04/20/nurturing-child-criminals-an-indictment-of-guyanese-society/