AmCham Guyana expels Anter Narine

The American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) in Guyana, in a statement, has indicated that it had expelled its member, Anter Narine.

Narine’s name was mentioned in accusations by the APNU+AFC that he was seen in the company of several Russians at the Marriot Hotel on Elections Day on Monday.
On Thursday, Minister of Public Security, Khemraj Ramjattan, told the media, at a press briefing at the party’s campaign headquarters on Lamaha Street, that three foreign nationals were deported on Monday after investigations revealed that the men were conspiring to tap into the systems of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM).

“I want to say that we are still somewhat hazy on the position. Indeed we had three persons who were speaking to leading members of the PPP at the Marriott Hotel one out of Libya, one out of Russia and one out of America with Russian background that came into this country and we had to deport them on elections day after our intelligence realized that there was some conspiracy to tap into GECOM computer system. They were immediately deported. A fourth one who was not found at his Marriott room is on the run somewhere. We are not finding him,” he told the media.

Minister of Public Telecommunications, Cathy Hughes who appeared with Ramjattan at the press briefing stated earlier on her Facebook page that Narine was seen in the company of the foreign nationals. She said cyber equipment were seized from the men.
“Have the Russians influenced our election process? Did they interfere? Why was AmCham member Anter Narine seen having dinner with these persons?
Americans do not accept this in their country why should we here in Guyana?” she said.
Later on Thursday, AmCham Guyana noted in a statement that it was concerned by Hughes’ statement. The body said that it was formed under the auspices of former US ambassador Perry Holloway and the current US Ambassador Sarah Ann Lynch, who sits as its honorary chair.

As regards the elections, the body said it has been instrumental as a GECOM-accredited observer and that it has been a central hub of observer missions and that it has assembled a team of accomplished officials to observe Guyana’s elections.
While noting that its team has been exposed to the requisite training to observe the elections, the body said that all its members have signed an international code of conduct to observe the elections.

Narine is said to be an active member of the Peoples Progressive Party/Civic and has been seen in the company of that party’s leaders at various public events.
Ramjattan said that the Commissioner of Police has been briefed on the matter regarding the Russians.

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_03_06_2020

Allegations of Russian meddling surface

…three deported after being found with spy equipment

By Svetlana Marshall


ALLEGATIONS of Russian interference in Guyana’s General and Regional Elections surfaced on Thursday with the Ministry of Public Security, Khemraj Ramjattan reporting that cyber equipment has been seized and three persons with Russian background, deported. A fourth Russian operative, he said, has not been located. The cyber equipment included computers and flash drives.

Ramjattan, who is also the Prime Ministerial Candidate of the APNU+AFC, addressed journalists on the issue during a press conference at the APNU+AFC Command Centre in Georgetown on Thursday.

It is alleged that the American Chamber Association of Guyana (AmCham Guyana) were facilitating four suspicious Russians since their arrival on Saturday, February 29, 2020 but AmCham has strongly rejected the allegation. Immigration, based on directives from Ramjattan, subsequently detained and questioned three of the suspects before deporting them.

The Public Security Minister not only implicated AmCham, but also the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C), even as he pointed to Winston Brassington, who was reportedly, photographed speaking with a Russian. “We had three persons who were speaking to leading members of the PPP at the Marriott Hotel – one out of Libya [with Russian background), one out of Russian, one of America with a Russian background that came into this country and we had to deport them on Elections Day after our intelligence realised that there was some conspiracy to tap into GECOM’s computer system. They were immediately deported,” Ramjattan told journalists. The fourth Russian is on the run, he further stated. The men reportedly alleged that they were in the country to work for US oil-giant ExxonMobil – the company currently leading oil and gas production in Guyana.

According to him, based on the ministry’s intelligence, Leader of the Opposition, Bharrat Jagdeo, was also speaking to the questionable individuals in Russian. He also singled out AmCham member, Anter Narine, for engaging the now-deported individuals. PPP/C aligned lawyers had also reached out to the Guyana Police Force to make representation on behalf of the Russians.

Questioned whether the Russian Embassy has been informed and representatives from AmCham Guyana called in for questioning given the seriousness of the allegation, the security minister responded in the negative.

“We did not call in the Russian Embassy neither the AmCham…We don’t think that there might be any Russian Embassy connections here. I think the connection is straight to the PPP,” Ramjattan said. While the Russian Embassy and AmCham were not contacted, the security minister indicated that ExxonMobil was contacted by the Commissioner of Police, Leslie James to confirm or negate the information provided by the Russians.

Questioned why the Russians were deported and not detained to allow for a thorough and complete investigation, the security minister said he made a judgment call. “Because I thought that to be the wisest thing at that moment, judgment calls have to be made and when you are a minister these are the decisions you have to make at an executive level,” he said.

Pressed for more answers, Ramjattan said “Yes, I thought it was a wise decision; don’t ask me the reason behind it.”

Minister Ramjattan, who was backed by Public Telecommunications Minister, Catherine Hughes, said while the Russians were deported on Elections Day (Monday, March 2, 2020), the government took a decision not to make the reports public. Both ministers said it was only until the government was approached by sections of the press on the matter, was a decision taken to publicly address the matter.

“It would not have been appropriate,” Minister Hughes said, when pressed for answers. She added: “We have very clear security channels, the requisite organisations were contacted, fortunately they examined the situation and the information that they received, they deemed it credible and they found three of the four persons, and given that this was occurring on the early morning of the most important day of our history, the decision was taken that they had no grounds for these persons to be here and they were deported.” Minister Hughes said chaos would have ensued if the information was made public on Monday.

Meanwhile in a statement, AmCham said it took note of Minister Hughes’ remarks which attempt to impugn the character and integrity of AMCHAM. “AMCHAM wishes to assure every Guyanese that all of the persons accredited as observers by the Guyana Elections Commission went through a high level of scrutiny by the organisation before their names were submitted to GECOM, and further wishes to state that no Russian citizens (or any of the individuals referred to in Mrs. Hughes’ statement for that matter) were submitted by AMCHAM to the Guyana Elections Commission to be accredited. This can easily be verified with the Guyana Elections Commission,” the organisation said.

It maintained that none of Amcham’s members have been deported, charged with a crime, or otherwise. “In the unfortunate event it is found that there in fact were individuals or their associates working against Guyana’s sovereign interests, AMCHAM joins Mrs. Hughes in strong condemnation of any such attempts,” it emphasised.

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_03_06_2020

Western diplomats urge acceptance of elections results

The Ambassador of the United States of America, H.E. Sarah-Ann Lynch, the British High Commissioner, H.E. Greg Quinn, the Canadian High Commissioner, H.E. Lilian Chatterjee, and the Ambassador of the European Union, H.E. Fernando Ponz-Canto have called for the acceptance of the final results of the March 2, 2020 elections.

In a statement on Friday the diplomats said that they note that the recount process is coming to a conclusion. “We congratulate those who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to ensuring full transparency in the recount process. This includes political parties, staff of the Guyana Elections Commission, scrutineers from the Caribbean Community and the Organization of American States, the Advisor from the Commonwealth and observers. The dedication of all is a credit to the democratic process in Guyana,” the diplomats said in a joint statement.

“We also commend President Granger and the Leader of the Opposition for their support of the recount, and for their clear commitment to abide by the results. As this process concludes, it is important for all stakeholders to uphold the integrity of the process and peacefully accept the wishes of the Guyanese population. There will be disappointment for those who have lost. Those who are elected must take on this responsibility with humility and demonstrate that they will govern for the benefit of every Guyanese citizen.

We encourage party leaders to commit to constitutional reform and reconciliation to ensure every Guyanese, regardless of party affiliation, sees how their government will work in their best interest,” the ABCE diplomats said. They said as friends of Guyana, “we look forward to working with all parties to further support Guyana’s development for the benefit of all its people.”

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020

Truth is only feared when it uncovers its enemies

Dear Editor,
I REFER to “Top Cop rebuffs KN story”, in the Guyana Chronicle of June 03, 2020. For the Kaieteur News, a print media that, since May 2015, has been an unabashed mouthpiece of an undemocratic and well-documented criminal state political party, to accuse the Commissioner of Police of sending false information to the Guyana Elections Commission, outlines a disrespect for such an office, and a reckless disregard for attempts of seeking the truth.

But first of all, the Commissioner must be congratulated for the urgency with which he has treated with the GECOM’S request, since it concerns a matter of extreme importance to the national interest, the March 02, regional and general elections; and secondly, for his prompt response to what is clearly another attempt by this muckraker and shameless stranger to the truth print, to bring into disrepute, not only the Coalition’s well-documented evidence of absent Guyanese casting ballots on March 2, but also the Elections Commission into disrepute. One could have predicted this latest foul attack coming from a newsprint which now wallows in yellow putridity. No wonder it had been categorised as a muckraker in a senior diplomatic dispatch some years ago.

It is an absurdity, that in the face of insurmountable evidence of electoral fraud, and with the GECOM having the vested authority to investigate such instances, granted in accordance with Article 162 of the Constitution, from which authority the Gazzetted Recount flows, that such a brazen attempt is mounted via a pathetic mouthpiece to bring the entire forensic process into disrepute. Surely, the eminent Editor, Adam Harris, had every right to exit such a filthy political media cesspool.

Reading the Kaieteur News story, it reeks of that familiar air of political corruption of the highest kind, for it is an attempt to cast similar aspersions on the Commissioner of Police for doing his duty in his constitutional discharge of supplying information on a very critical issue of national import. KN must be reminded that any such information requested from such a State institution responsible for such records, that there must be a response forthcoming, particularly to a request emanating from a constitutional organ as the GECOM.

Each day, it is appalling to observe that the media, which is said to be the public’s watch-dog, its pro-opposition segments, continues to be deliberate in the opposite direction of truth, as it aids and abets the opposition PPP/C in its vicious assault on the truth, as is clearly the instance in this extant matter where the credibility of the Commissioner of Police is being attacked.

It cannot be normal in any society for the truth not to be SOUGHT, or those opposed to such a search continue to use various subterfuge to impede its revelation. It cannot be normal either for truth to continuously be made a football, to be kicked in those dark directions so as to conceal its contents. It can only occur in a country in which anti-democratic forces abound, inclusive of those who thirst for political power at all costs, and who have managed to undermine the democratic process in a variety of ways, as has ever since become known.

It even becomes a national tragedy, of epic proportions, when the vested interest media, continues to aid and abet such a dangerous endeavour. It brings one to the perennial question, not really needed to be asked, but should be repeated, why are these dark forces, inclusive of the KN and its kindred rabble types, so bent on obfuscating and discrediting the current process of recount that was initiated to ascertain the credibility of the March 02, electoral process? Obviously, the answer is FEAR OF BEING DISCOVERED, OF BEING FOUND OUT, FOR THE ELECTORAL CRIMINALITY PERPETRATED ON THE NATION’S ELECTORAL PROCESS, BY ITS POLITICAL CARD. And the KN is a significant part and parcel of these crooked attempts at deceiving the nation. All AND SUNDRY MUST BE REMINDED, INCLUSIVE OF THE KN THAT THE TRUTH IS ONLY FEARED WHEN IT BRINGS TO LIGHT ITS ENEMIES.


Regards,
Troy Garraway

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020

Serious concerns about the role of some mainstream media in these delicate times

Dear Editor,
IN an article written by me and published in the Stabroek News dated 3rd June, 2020 and captioned “Recount is not about simple numbers but a more complex and complete evaluation,” I presented factual evidence to buttress the claim as captured in the headline of said letter in response to the effrontery of the European Union Ambassador Fernando Ponz Canto suggesting, in spite of the very glaring evidence of electoral fraud and corruption discovered in every region, that “it was impossible to cheat”.

It was disappointing after presenting irrefutable evidence extracted from an easily accessible public document found on the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) website, outlining the legal defining characteristics of the recount that I was forced to respond to a misleading editorial commentary to reiterate, “The gazetted Order of 4th May, 2020 speaks to a National Recount, and this specifies areas of particular focus for review. It is not your call, my call, or any other but GECOM to stipulate at this point (or at any point) what the recount focus is, and what, therefore, must be reported on. Clearly, this key issue has been missed. Efforts by many to misrepresent the Recount is noted.” (3rd June).

The foregoing comment was made in response to the misleading “Editor-in-Chief’s note: The so-called anomalies raised by APNU+AFC agents in these observation reports have no basis. They are fishing expeditions. One of the most egregious claims by APNU+AFC was the supposed non-stamping of the ballots of the Disciplined Services which Mr. Lewis interestingly avoids mentioning. This is a recount, not an audit, or an election petition. The GECOM Chair is duty-bound to declare the recount result, and to do so expeditiously.”

This seemingly simple editorial note is an act of suppression; it is misleading, and an attempt not to acknowledge the very profound aspects of the Order that determine the nature of the recount, designed and agreed to by GECOM as a means of ascertaining credibility. The readership is reminded that it was Anil Nandlall, former PPP/C Attorney-General, who opined that “fraud, once committed, makes everything a nullity…ab initio”. The Opposition having agreed to the specifics of the Order is now changing its voice, and so are those specific international agents whom we must now call international dictators espousing a vulgar diplomacy.

The editor and the newspaper were wrong; not wrong to editorialise, for that is the prerogative of ownership, but wrong in their use of editorial power to misrepresent public information. In so doing, they fool a large cross-section of the Guyanese community and world at large. I submit that this is not accidental; it represents glaring support of an organised campaign to discredit certain views, and the persons who make them, thus making them less than credible in the eyes of the reading public.

It sets out the pillars of destabilisation of the truth of the 2020 Elections and the recount which the Opposition and international dictators are seeking to use as a foundation for clandestine machinations at regime change by any means necessary. I again remind readers of the Organisation of American States (OAS)’s role in the Bolivia story, and what is taking place politically in the countries that form the Guianas oil basin. Venezuela, Guyana, and most recently, the exposure of OAS ignorance and/or disregard for Surinamese laws.

There is an organised effort by several actors in and out of Guyana who speak from the same script, to present an impression of many sources, in support of the Opposition and denouncing GECOM. It is not lost on a large section of the Guyanese community that there is a political warfare being waged among the contesting parties of the 2020 elections. It is also obvious that some mainstream media have formed an alliance to influence domestic and international understanding of Guyana’s politics and electoral reality. There is serious concern about said role in these delicate times. Only time will tell the fruit Guyana will reap from what has been sowed.


Regards,
Lincoln Lewis

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020

Oil and water don’t mix

Dear Editor,
IF power-sharing in government is being contemplated at this time, I hope that commonsense and good sense will prevail and expose the folly, in all its aspects, of such a disastrous proposal and plan which is embodied and clothed with catastrophic consequences.

Examining historical data of governance for the 23 years prior to May 2015 clearly indicates that a particular political party should not be included in its present form, unless it cleans up its act. However, recent events that expose massive voter fraud in the current Recount Exercise that was Gazetted on May 4, 2020, point to that particular political party as the perpetrators.

Now, let the progress continue with the just over four year’s success story that Guyana was enjoying under the steady hand of President Granger and his APNU/AFC Coalition Government. Do not spoil it now with a lapse of foresight and positive thinking and sabotage the unprecedented progress that Guyana enjoyed with its transformation from being a Pariah State internationally, and where Guyanese began to enjoy the GOOD LIFE in such a short time. Changing course at this crucial time will be an incorrigible mistake, and place an irrefutable curse on the perpetrators of such an irreconcilable misstep.

However, I feel that House-To-House (HTH) Registration will be recommended and mandated by GECOM after determining that Guyana Elections 2020 are NOT Credible, due to the massive voter fraud encountered in the Forensic Recount of the ballots in the ballot boxes in all the Ten (10) Regions.

A CREDIBLE List OF Electors will then be prepared from the HTH Registration exercise, necessitating Credible Elections as soon as practicably possible.

It is hoped that during this time, all political parties will clean up their act, purify their body politic, and choose worthy participants who would qualify to participate in power-sharing in Government. Not now, then might be the appropriate time for discussing and introducing Inclusive Governance if, for ‘Christ’s sake’, the political parties ever agree to such a forward step that the President says is embodied in the Guyana Constitution. The correct timing of such an event is crucial and of utmost importance to the honest and long-term development of Guyana, particularly in Guyana’s current oil age.


Sincerely,
Thomas Saunders

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020

National unity: It’s about time

Dear Editor,
IN medicine, a patient would relate his/her symptoms to a doctor before any attempt at a diagnosis is made; and, most of the time, after tests are done, the doctor is able to make a diagnosis. Thereafter, treatment is administered, as in the case of cancer, to get to the source of the problem. In other words, treatment is given, not directly to the symptoms presented, but to the root of the underlying disease.

Guyana is in the throes of a colossal political mess, unparalleled in the annals of electioneering, a solution for which not even the international observers and foreign missions, including the US and Canadian Ambassadors, to name just two, have so far been able to influence. The ruling ‘caretaker’ government seems to have no qualms as they brazenly thumb their noses at all but their own activists, apologists, and radical political base.

A recount has been in progress for a month, despite a total vote count of around a mere half million, and following it for most of us is like watching grass grow! And every day comes with new communiques by the ruling party, not the least of which have been wild accusations of fraud at polling stations, including voting by people who allegedly had left the country, and ‘statistical anomalies,’ though the numbers of votes involved in these trumped-up claims are just infinitesimal to even come close to affect the final outcome.
While the entire country, diaspora, and the world watch as the recount ‘progresses,’ the ruling party, with the backing of the Armed Forces, lopsidedly staffed by its own supporters, videos of which give the erroneous impression of a monoracial population, is giving no hint it is likely to compromise and respect the will of the electorate. In fact, all indications point to possible myriad court actions if the recount indicates they lost.

Also, even the GECOM Commissioner, an ex-judge, has been acting as if under orders from APNU headquarters. And it goes on and on, as the country’s affairs are on a protracted hold, and with no silver lining visible to buoy the hopes of decent-minded Guyanese and the world at large.

I am one who has always looked beyond party loyalty for a just solution to the problems plaguing the Guyanese people, and I have, in letters to the press over the years, long before March 2, 2020, given vent to my views. I’ve posited, inter alia, that the British, as they were washing their hands of the colonies in their vast empire, too often resorted to a divide-and-rule strategy, one that resulted in a deep schism between the two major races in Guyana, starting with the Jagan-Burnham split they engineered. History will attest that they left us with nothing but a quagmire, after changing the electoral system from First-Past-The-Post (incidentally, a system still used in the UK) to Proportional Representation, as a means of geting rid of Cheddi Jagan, consistent with the wishes of Forbes Burnham and Peter D’Aguiar, then leaders of the opposition parties. Of course, we all know how D’Aguiar was shoved to the sidelines while Burnham pursued policies that drove the country to near bankruptcy while fattening his personal coffers.

As we witness the intransigence of the APNU/AFC government, in defiance of all other stakeholders, including foreign missions and observers, it is of vital importance that we strive to get to the root of the problem giving rise to the present scenario. The rift orchestrated by our former colonial masters resulted in a marked division, with the two major races eyeing each other with distrust, and at the polls, East Indians supporting Cheddi Jagan, Afro-Guyanese, Forbes Burnham. It is this, the underlying problem, that rears its ugly head come election-time every five years.

Some on each side of the political spectrum would argue that their party has made significant inroads into the other’s political base, and that there is no longer that racial divide when it comes to voting. I posit that such an argument is simply specious; and I’d be happy to revisit my stance on this when, for example, at least ten per cent of Port Mourant support the PNC and ten per cent of Buxton support the PPP! The problem of a racial pattern of voting is alive and kicking, and it is too often exploited by politicians. This is the source of the quandary we face in Guyana today, and unless addressed with a bipartisan approach, it is likely to continue unchecked, cycle after election cycle.
Indeed, the barefaced electoral fraud being perpetrated today is of the most unconscionable and egregious nature. However, I submit, what is happening are merely symptoms of the underlying problem; the said ethnic schism bequeathed us by the British.

And part of the problem is that the clear losers of this election, the APNU/WPA coalition, cognizant of the skewed pattern of voting, and that consequently they are likely this time to be relegated to history unless the PPP/C engages in the type of reckless governance they were accused of prior to 2015, are not inclined to concede.

What we need to do is, as I’ve indicated in my opening analogy, address the root of the problem instead of concentrating on the symptoms. It’s a malignancy that’s been metastasising for too long, and is likely to lead to devastating results, unless partisanship is shelved and a rational approach is adopted. I repeat, what we are witnessing are symptoms of the underlying problem, and little, if any, headway is likely if we keep concentrating only on the symptoms.

I have, in previous letters, suggested some form of a national-unity government, under the watchful eyes of an oversight committee comprising of elderly statesmen, members of the clergy involving the major religions, and a few lay folks, and I’ve touched on some of the vast benefits likely to follow. I quote the relevant paragraph in my February 17, 2017 letter: “The benefits of a national-unity government can be legion.

A bipartisan approach can lead to a drastic improvement in the crime situation, including the scourge of break-in robberies that for too long have been plaguing business and home owners and posing a disincentive for the many overseas-based Guyanese intent on re-migrating. And, most important, a surge in the economy is to be expected, with an uptick in entrepreneurship both by locals and re-migrants, and the consequent job creation which is likely to ensue.” Obviously, with national unity, we can expect a win-win situation for all. But the greatest benefit to be derived would be a populace living in harmony, in the absence of political mudslinging and gridlock at all levels.

A travesty of electoral justice has been inflicted on the Guyanese people, and now three months later, we are still waiting for a declaration of the winner. With the widespread support of foreign observers and missions on the side of fairness and transparency, a final and just resolution is still possible. It is abundantly clear the PPP/C won on March 2, and they should be declared as such. I hope that with the swearing-in of a new government, the task of forging unity would be paramount.

Perhaps we can follow the example set by the great Nelson Mandela, who, after twenty-seven years of his life was stolen from him, emerged from prison with neither revenge nor rancor, but racial unity and harmony uppermost in his mind. Of course, we all know how he stood tall, stayed the course, and made his country a much better place for all South Africans. This is also possible in Guyana, recognized as home to one of the nicest and most hospitable peoples on earth; so, my fellow Guyanese, let’s wake up and strive for national unity – it’s about time!


Regards,
Abel Peters

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020

More missing documents from PPP strongholds

– GECOM meets today to discuss way forward

AT the end of Friday, 76 ballot boxes from the Demerara-Mahaica Region (Region Four) were processed, however, a number of those counted boxes were not tabulated due to the absence of important documents, and the commission’s decision is being awaited.

In fact, Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) Commissioner Vincent Alexander, told the media that all the documents for some 21 boxes were missing. These boxes contained only ballots. This was an issue that was raised on Thursday by A Partnership for National Unity + Alliance For Change (APNU+AFC) executive member Joseph Harmon, and the very irregularity continued the following day.

This, Alexander said, is very strange, especially since they are coming in a cluster, and all seems to be in People’s Progressive Party/ Civic (PPP/C) strongholds.

“A significant number of boxes from Thursday into Friday were found with only ballots in their contents. The other documents, the Official List of Electors (OLE), the counterfoils, all those documents which [are] supposed to give information about who should have voted, are not in the box. This is strange, and what is even stranger is that it’s coming in a cluster. It’s not one far and in between. There are those who would argue there were similar instances prior, but I myself don’t recall a similar instance where absolutely nothing else other than ballots [is] in the box. Here we have this apparent cluster,” Alexander posited.

In addition to the cluster, coincidentally or not, all these boxes reflect exceedingly high figures for the PPP/C.
These boxes came from polling stations such as Montrose Primary School, People’s Assembly of God Church, LBI Primary School, Chateau Margot Primary School, and more.
Alexander said that the decision made,is to have the secretariat do an investigation into this matter, and to render a report before proceeding to making a determination in relation to the ballots.

The question of whether these ballots can be deemed invalid due to the absence of the documents is still to be determined by the commission, he noted further.

“There’s no reconciliation to what is in the boxes… But at the end of the day you cannot disenfranchise anyone because people must have voted and therefore the question that will have to be asked, is what happened, or how you can ensure these people have voted. The question to the people’s franchise has to be processed,” Alexander said.

The meeting is set for today to decide a way further on these boxes with missing documents and the immigration list, among other issues.

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020

In defence of Justice Claudette Singh

Dear Editor,
AS the recount process comes closer to completion, Mr. Frederick Kissoon is demonstrating that he is in a “deep” opposition conspiracy with elements supportive of the PPP/C to discredit and demonise GECOM’s Chair, Justice (Ret’d) Claudette Singh as they accuse her of collaboration with the government and the APNU+AFC to rig the elections, and now the recount process. His most recent attack on Madam Chairman Singh is contained in his June 2, 2020 KN column, captioned “Claudette Singh and deep-state conspiracy”.

Here are a few examples of Kissoon’s revolting abuse of Claudette Singh: – “… to explain the nasty, ugly connections between the police, GECOM, and the government to derail the 2020 election.”; – “ …there is a deep state conspiracy to rig the elections results. That has been happening since March 4, Claudette Singh cannot escape scrutiny in this scenario. “; – “ Singh has skipped from one ugly decision to another that is simply destroying this country”; and “ Her latest display is her communication to the Police Commissioner on allegations made by APNU+AFC.

Kissoon’s reference contained in my last quote attempts to further tarnish the reputation of Madam Singh when he alleged in his column that she didn’t see it as ethical or decent to include the Commission in her decision…..” This claim of Kissoon is without foundation, is a blatant lie and should be cause for libel action against him by Madam Chairman Singh, if she so chooses to proceed against him. It is clear that he has been fed a diet of lies by his friends at Freedom House, and vomits it up without even the benefit of a cursory check to find out if what he claimed is true.

I am advised by Commissioner Desmond Trotman that at a meeting of the Commission, Madam Chairman Singh brought to the attention of the Commission the relevant information and the course of action she had taken. Her action flowed from two previous meetings. The first was with the APNU+AFC when their representatives referred to serious anomalies witnessed by their agents in the evolving recount exercise. They were told to provide the evidence they claimed to have, and when that was done steps would be taken by GECOM to verify the validity of the concerns raised.

The second meeting, which occurred on the next day, was one of GECOM Commissioners, which discussed the issues raised at the meeting between GECOM and the APNU+AFC delegation. I am further advised by Commissioner Trotman that Madam Chairman Singh at that meeting made the point that he who asserts must prove and she committed to acting to clarify whether the information, once provided had merit.

In my humble opinion, Kissoon’s ramblings lack merit and are merely propaganda items manufactured in Freedom House to advance their devious campaign to bully their way back into office.

I propose to examine here the most recent controversy over the GECOM Chair writing to the Police Commissioner to verify names on an APNU+AFC list submitted to GECOM as persons who allegedly voted on Election Day when, in fact, they were out of the country. This matter is linked to the PPP/C’s objection that GECOM has no power to address irregularities and anomalies in the recount process. There are opposing views both in and out of GECOM, and with most legal matters, the courts are the final arbiter on these controversies. In the absence of a court ruling, the Chair and GECOM have to press forward bearing in mind the following: Time-frame of the recount; the known division in the Commission; and the need for addressing the important revelations coming out of the examination of the ballot boxes.

These are all in the national interest since it is important for the acceptance of the recount findings. In this situation, Chairman Claudette Singh will be expected to cast the crucial vote if the Commission is deadlocked if and when a vote is taken. She, therefore, needs to be allowed some space to inform herself on matters she needs to address. Writing to the Police Commissioner for immigration information is one such occasion. The PPP/C and Kissoon and his handlers, in their obsession with “power”, are not thinking right. They are poor dialecticians, to say the least. They fail to see the intrinsic interrelation between Claudette Singh’s ability to exercise her casting vote objectively and independently, which requires her to be confident of information laid before her. Denying her that critical space can be counterproductive to the PPP/C’s interest.

Kissoon’s erroneous theory of “deep-state conspiracy” is malicious and dangerous propaganda that can destroy the fragile fabric of our society. He writes: “Singh has skipped from one ugly decision to another that is simply destroying this country.” Any objective observer of the election crisis will be hard-pressed not to recognise the perilous situation that GECOM and the country are facing as we seek to determine the credibility of the elections. If Claudette Singh did not act responsibly in the election crisis, we may not be speaking of wanting a democratic outcome. To the extent that we are not burning like America is the result of the good sense demonstrated by the President, the Opposition Leader and the Chair of GECOM. Only the mind of a “political lunatic” can’t comprehend this reality.

As I said earlier, the PPP/C, Kissoon and his handlers are not thinking, but are driven by “lust for power”. Their chosen strategy of attacking, demonising and falsely accusing the GECOM Chair of colluding with the government and APNU+AFC can backfire for that party and their supporters, like Kissoon. All the Chair has to do at the critical moment is to declare that the Opposition has no confidence in her impartiality, and as such refuse to vote.

I end by stating that the PPP/C’s political nearsightedness in their dealing with GECOM and Chair, Justice (Ret’d) Claudette Singh is self-defeating.


Regards,
Tacuma Ogunseye

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020

‘I’m unfazed by PPP antics’

…Harmon says coalition will continue press GECOM to address irregularities

CONSEQUENT upon the request by A Partnership for National Unity + Alliance For Change (APNU+AFC) executive member Joseph Harmon for a response from the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) on what will be the outcome of his party’s objections in the national recount process, People’s Progressive Party agent Anil Nandlall has written the commissioner of police stating that what Harmon did amounts to a threat.
Harmon voiced this on Friday in his briefing with the media, pronouncing further that he is not fazed by Nandlall nor any of the opposition’s couriers.

Nandlall wrote the police commissioner saying that I issued a threat. I do not know who retained him to write that letter– I suppose it’s the PPP– that [my writing] on behalf of the people of Guyana requiring GECOM to do what they are legally required to do, that that amounts to a threat. Well I want to say to Mr. Nandlall and the other people who have built an annex to Freedom House under these tents, that that does not faze me. I will continue to press for the right and the justice of our Guyanese people to ensure that their votes are properly counted and validated and whatever comes out of this process, represents the will of the Guyanese people expressed on March 2 2020,” Harmon said.

He told the media that his major concern is how GECOM will treat with the anomalies raised and irregularities identified, since he is of the view that it is going to be a challenge for the commission to come to a definitive position where the votes are concerned; especially since the number of cases they have raised has compromised a qualitative figure of 90,000 votes.

“These are major issues which touch and concern the credibility of this process and concern the votes that are tabulated. What is taking place right now is a tabulation of those votes and so when it is announced as valid, we have an objection to that, because a valid vote is a vote that has actually been tabulated and gone through a process of assessment, taken into consideration, the observations and the objections which have been made; and they are many. There are hundreds of persons we have objected to who were not here on the second of March and voted. We had several persons who are dead and voted,” Harmon expressed.

Alluding further that, “The phenomenon yesterday particularly as it relates to votes on the lower East Coast, where somehow it appears that all the POs that were doing duty in predominant PPP strongholds forgot all the training they got from GECOM and therefore you have boxes with ballots only. That’s a very obnoxious position that anyone can take to say that these are valid votes and I’m happy to see this morning that tabulation officers are at it. And they brought to our attention several other boxes with the same disease.”
He said that all they are requesting to know, is how the commission will respond to these concerns which were raised by the party. Harmon noted too that this part of the process will be done very shortly, “so we must have a clear position on that particular issue, and they have an obligation to respond to these issues.”

Harmon said that it is his party’s responsibility as a stakeholder in the recount process to put to the commission, all of the defects they have seen, which he says amount to electoral fraud.

But in the commission itself, he pointed out, “the PPP commissioners were filibustering, they were trying to prevent the commission from meeting to deliberate on these matters, so that they can run out with these only tabulated numbers to say that we win or lost.”
He reiterated that the process is not completed at the end of this phase, in fact, “it’s a four- stage process. So after the count is done, there’s a report that has to be submitted by the chief elections officer, that report has to be deliberated upon by the commission itself, and once the commission finishes its deliberations, the chair will make a declaration or statement,” he explained.

However, Harmon also indicated that the party abides by President Granger’s position; that they will await the GECOM chairperson’s decision.

Caricom team

In addition, he said that he believes the CARICOM team’s report will be persuasive, “because they have been brought here to oversee and scrutinise the process and I suspect, they, having been here for the entire period, they like us would have seen on a daily basis, the genies that are emerging out of these boxes when they are open. We trust that GECOM would make an honest assessment of what they saw and produce to the elections commission, a report that deals with the credibility of the process. We recognise GECOM as being the competent authority, and we trust the chair will make an honest declaration with what is before her. The observations and objections of the recount must be the facts to be taken into consideration in making her determination,” Harmon posited.

Meanwhile, Nandlall told the media that someone in the secretariat mischievously advised recount personnel to be inserted into the Observation Report, language to suggest that the votes and the recount are invalid.

To this end, he said that it is unfortunate language since he is of the understanding that no one in the recount process can invalidate a ballot except the ballot is a forgery, or if it has multiple marks or if it is unstamped.

In fact, he said all the objections being raised by the coalition are not grounds to give GECOM the power to invalidate a vote. This power, he said, only lies in an elections court.
He stated too that GECOM cannot determine the credibility of the elections. “No man can be a judge in his own cause. GECOM can’t judge its own process. GECOM managed the electoral process, so they can’t sit to judge themselves.

More importantly, the constitution says that only the High Court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine any allegation of irregularity and negligent conduct or actions at an election,” Nandlall said.

Source: https://issuu.com/guyanachroniclee-paper/docs/guyana_chronicle_epaper_06_06_2020